Thought leadership

Rail & Aviation: Different methods, same challenge… Effective Asset Management

Matt Prosser, Angel Trains’ technical director, recently asked me to present at the prestigious Institute of Mechanical and Electrical Engineers, Rolling Stock conference on the differences in asset management between rail and aviation.

With 25 years in aviation and 14 years in rail, I have a solid grasp of asset management in both sectors.

Researching the project was engaging, as it prompted me to reassess my longstanding assumptions. I discovered that while industries share many similarities, their asset management strategies have diverged significantly over the past 40 years.

Reflecting on the 1980s, asset management in both aviation and rail was quite similar – typically reactive. I remember when a new aircraft arrived at the hangar; countless job cards would be stacked on the mezzanine floor, and engineers would select tasks almost at random. Thinking back, it’s surprising we managed to get the aircraft out on time. Often, we didn’t!

In the mid-to-late 1980s and early 1990s, Stelios Haji-Ioannou introduced orange planes with bold numbers, aiming not to compete with British Airways but to promote affordable flying; his first campaign compared flying to Europe with buying jeans. This made air travel accessible to many more people. It also placed existential cost pressures on legacy carriers like British Airways.

Low-cost carriers like EasyJet, Ryanair, and Southwest Airlines disrupted the aviation industry, pushing legacy airlines to adopt a more commercial mindset. Over the past 40 years, this shift has transformed aviation asset and maintenance management into commercially driven practices, while rail asset management remains focused on technology and service; with some influence from political actions such as franchising and privatisation.

Asset ‘through-life’ cost management in aviation is now more prominent and integrated. Since reliability-centred maintenance (RCM) is a mandatory requirement in aviation, RCM is conducted during the design phase through the maintenance steering group (MSG) philosophy.

This approach in aviation has led to a relentless drive to reduce maintenance whilst always maintaining safety compliance. At the same time reliability levels have been increased. For example, aircraft engines are regularly now left on wing for over six years. If we consider the older 747 style aircraft a typical see check was around 12,000 labour hours, ten days on the ground; whereas with the modern 787 the same check is 3,500 labour hours and just three days on the ground. In fact, the modern civil airliner spends over half its life in the air flying.

Summarising some of the key difference I observed:

  • Through-life cost management of asset has much sharper focus
  • Planning (TOTAL Planning) is evident and foremost
  • Understanding of effective modern maintenance is sharp and is monitored and controlled robustly
  • Technology supports process, rather than driving it
  • Asset risks are proactively managed vs a more risk-averse perspective

The introduction of GB Rail presents a valuable opportunity for the rail industry to regain strategic momentum. My research indicates that the rail sector benefits from advanced technology and a wealth of highly skilled professionals. Additionally, the cost management strategies GB Rail will implement – including reliability-centred maintenance and techniques adopted from aviation – are poised to substantially enhance the cost performance of the public railway system.

Reliability-centred Asset Management

1970’s
RCM Triggered
B747, 12k hours, 10 days on ground

2010’s
RCM Advanced – Telemetry
B787, 3.5k hours, 3 days on ground

The introduction of GB Rail presents a valuable opportunity for the rail industry to regain strategic momentum. My research indicates that the rail sector benefits from advanced technology and a wealth of highly skilled professionals. Additionally, the cost management strategies GB Rail will implement – including reliability-centred maintenance and techniques adopted from aviation – are poised to substantially enhance the cost performance of the public railway system.

Click here for full presentation

 

Find out more about IMechE’s training courses and events connecting the railway engineering community, and to share knowledge and drive industry progress – https://www.imeche.org/training-qualifications/topics/railway

Get in touch

    Hello EngPro,
    My name is ,
    I work for
    and I need help with .
    You can email me at
    ,
    or call me at .


    Alternatively,

    Call us via +44 (0)7841 029 276

    Email us at contact@engpro.co.uk

    Our hours of operation are 9.00am – 5.00pm, Monday – Friday

    EngPro Solutions Limited are the data controllers of any personal data you provide to us. For further information on our uses of your personal data, please see our privacy policy. By submitting this form, you allow EngPro Solutions Limited to use the information provided for the purpose the form was submitted. We will not use your information for anything other than the purpose intended.